Infection Burden for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States

J Arthroplasty · 2008 · Classic · cited 1,003 times

Steven M. Kurtz, Edmund Lau, Jordana K. Schmier, Kevin Ong, Ke Zhao, Javad Parvizi

Exponent Inc, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104

Adult Reconstruction

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONPeriprosthetic hip and knee infections cause longer stays and significantly higher costs; infection rates vary by hospital type and geographic location.
Abstract, as published

We quantified the current and historical incidence of periprosthetic infection associated with hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, as well as corresponding hospitalization charges and length of stay. The rate of infected knee arthroplasties was 0.92%, significantly greater than that of infected hip arthroplasties with 0.88%. Length of stay was significantly longer for infected hip (9.7 days) and knee (7.6 days) arthroplasties compared to uninfected procedures (hip, 4.3 days; knee, 3.9 days) (P < .0001). Hospitalization charges were also significantly greater for infected joint arthroplasties than for uninfected arthroplasties (hips, 1.76 times; knees, 1.52 times) (P < .0001). Urban-non-teaching hospitals experienced the highest burden of infection with 1.18% for hips and 1.26% for knees compared to rural (0.61% for hips and 0.69% for knees) and urban-teaching hospitals (0.73% for hips and 0.77% for knees). We found an increasing number of joint arthroplasties being diagnosed with periprosthetic infection.

Featured in the 2026-06-25 issue.

← Are Age-based Cutoffs for THA Logically Consistent?The Knee Society Total Knee Arthroplasty Roentgenographic Eva… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.