Psychometric properties of the shortened disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with shoulder pain

J Shoulder Elbow Surg · 2009 · Classic · cited 599 times

Paul E. Mintken, Paul Glynn, Joshua A. Cleland

Physical Therapy Program, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Colorado Denver

Shoulder & Elbow

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONQuickDASH and Numeric Pain Rating Scale show good test-retest reliability and responsiveness in shoulder pain patients, with MCIDs of 8.0 and 1.1 points respectively.
Abstract, as published

PURPOSE: To examine the psychometric properties of the Shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) in patients with shoulder pain.

METHODS: Single-group repeated measures design in which 101 patients presenting to physical therapy completed the QuickDASH and the NPRS at the baseline examination and at a follow-up visit. At the follow-up all patients also completed the Global Rating of Change (GRC), which was used to dichotomize patients as improved or stable. Baseline and follow-up scores were used to determine the test-retest reliability, construct validity and minimal levels of detectable and clinically important change for both the QuickDASH and NPRS.

RESULTS: Test-retest reliability was 0.90 for the QuickDASH and 0.74 for the NPRS. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was 8.0 points for the QuickDASH and 1.1 for the NPRS.

CONCLUSION: The NPRS and QuickDASH exhibit good test-retest reliability and responsiveness in patients with shoulder pain.

Featured in the 2026-07-20 issue.

← Displaced Proximal Humeral FracturesThe Role of Inlay and Inset Glenoid Implants in Anatomic Tota… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.