Propionibacterium acnes infection after shoulder arthroplasty: A diagnostic challenge

J Shoulder Elbow Surg · 2009 · Classic · cited 354 times

Christopher C. Dodson, Edward V. Craig, Frank A. Cordasco, David M. Dines, Joshua S. Dines, Edward F. DiCarlo, et al.

Shoulder & Elbow

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONIn 11 cases, P. acnes shoulder arthroplasty infection was often subtle with normal-ish labs and slow-growing cultures (up to 2 weeks), complicating diagnosis; penicillin/clindamycin remained effective while metronidazole did not.
Abstract, as published

HYPOTHESIS: This study reviewed a series of patients diagnosed with Propionibacterium acnes infection after shoulder arthroplasty in order to describe its clinical presentation, the means of diagnosis, and provide options for treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2002 to 2006, 11 patients diagnosed with P acnes infection after shoulder arthroplasty were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed for (1) clinical diagnosis; (2) laboratory data, including white blood cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP); (3) fever; (4) number of days for laboratory growth of P acnes; (5) organism sensitivities; (6) antibiotic regimen and length of treatment; and (7) surgical management. Infection was diagnosed by 2 positive cultures.

RESULTS: Five patients had an initial diagnosis of infection and underwent implant removal, placement of an antibiotic spacer, and staged reimplantation after a course of intravenous antibiotics. In the remaining 6 patients, surgical treatment varied according to the clinical diagnosis. When infection was recognized by intraoperative cultures, antibiotics were initiated. The average initial ESR and CRP values were 33 mm/h and 2 mg/dL, respectively. The average number of days from collection to a positive culture was 9. All cultures were sensitive to penicillin and clindamycin and universally resistant to metronidazole.

DISCUSSION: Prosthetic joint infection secondary to P acnes is relatively rare; yet, when present, is an important cause of clinical implant failure. Successful treatment is hampered because clinical findings may be subtle, many of the traditional signs of infection are not present, and cultures may not be positive for as long as 2 weeks.

Featured in the 2026-09-22 issue.

← Whole-Body Compensation Supports Early Functional Hygiene Rec…The Superior Capsular Reconstruction: Lessons Learned and Fut… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.