The “Forgotten Joint” as the Ultimate Goal in Joint Arthroplasty

J Arthroplasty · 2011 · Classic · cited 864 times

Henrik Behrend, Karlmeinrad Giesinger, Johannes M. Giesinger, Markus S. Kuster

Adult Reconstruction

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONThe new Forgotten Joint Score showed high reliability and fewer ceiling effects than WOMAC subscales, better distinguishing good, very good, and excellent arthroplasty outcomes in 243 patients.
Abstract, as published

With improving patient outcome after joint arthroplasty, new assessment tools with increased discriminatory power especially in well-performing patients are desirable. The goal of the present study was to develop and validate a new score ("Forgotten Joint Score," or FJS) introducing a new aspect of patient-reported outcome: the patient's ability to forget the artificial joint in everyday life. After a pilot study, the FJS was validated and showed high internal consistency (Cronbach α = .95). Ceiling effects were considerably lower for the FJS (9.2%) compared with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities subscales (16.7%-46.7%). Known-group comparisons proved the FJS to be highly discriminative in a validation sample of 243 patients. The FJS not only reflects differences between "good" and "bad" but also between "good," "very good," and "excellent" outcomes. This concise score is appealing for its more adequate measurement range and because it measures the new, promising concept of the "forgotten joint."

Featured in the 2026-10-12 issue.

← Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: Evolution, Evidence, and Future D…Short- to mid-term outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in high… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.