Prospective Randomized Study of Direct Anterior vs Postero-Lateral Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty

J Arthroplasty · 2013 · Classic · cited 507 times

William P. Barrett, Shelly E. Turner, John Leopold

Adult Reconstruction

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONIn a randomized trial comparing direct anterior and posterolateral THA approaches, DAA patients had less early postoperative pain and faster functional recovery, with no differences by one year.
Abstract, as published

Benefits of a direct anterior approach (DAA) versus a posterior-lateral (PA) approach to THA were assessed in a single-surgeon, IRB-approved, prospective, randomized clinical study. Subjects (43 DAA and 44 PA) were evaluated at 6 weeks, and 3, 6 and 12 months. The primary end point was ability to climb stairs normally and walk unlimited at each time point. Secondary end points included assessment by several outcome instruments. DAA subjects performed better during the immediate post-operative period; they had lower VAS pain scores on the first post-operative day, more subjects climbing stairs normally and walking unlimited at 6 weeks, and higher HOOS Symptoms scores at 3 months. There were no significant differences between groups at later time points. Findings confirm previous reports of benefits of DAA versus PA in early post-operative phases.

Featured in the 2026-09-20 issue.

← Patients Undergoing Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Stif…Meniscal Root Injuries. →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.