Size Matters: Defining Critical in Bone Defect Size!

J Orthop Trauma · 2017 · Classic · cited 488 times

Emil H. Schemitsch

Department of Surgery, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, Canada

Orthopaedic Trauma

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONThis review concludes that critical-sized bone defects—generally around 2.5 cm or larger—have a poor natural history and are unlikely to heal without planned surgical reconstruction.
Abstract, as published

Bone defects are common and are associated with a significant burden of disease. The treatment of these injuries remains controversial, particularly those defects which are critical sized. Despite the need for decision making to be evidence based, a lack of consensus around definitions of critical-sized defects still exists, particularly around those defects in the 1-3 cm range. There is a need to define "critical" in bone defect size because noncritical defects may heal without planned reconstruction and secondary surgery. This article reviews the current evidence around the definition of a critical-sized bone defect and concludes that defects in the order of 2.5 cm or greater seem to have a poor natural history.

Featured in the 2026-08-18 issue.

← Essential Radiographic Evaluation for Distal Radius FracturesForearm Nonunions-From Masquelet to Free Vascularized Bone Gr… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.