Critical-Size Bone Defects: Is There a Consensus for Diagnosis and Treatment?

J Orthop Trauma · 2018 · Classic · cited 418 times

Aaron Nauth, Emil H. Schemitsch, Brent L. Norris, Zachary Nollin, John T. Watson

Orthopaedic Trauma

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONReviews the lack of consensus on defining and treating critical-size bone defects, covering induced membrane technique, biologics, and infected defect management.
Abstract, as published

There is a significant burden of disease associated with bone defects, and their management is challenging. These injuries have a profound clinical and economic impact, and outcomes are limited by high rates of complication and reoperation, as well as poor functional outcomes. There remains a lack of consensus around definitions, reliable models, and best practices for the surgical management of bone defects. The current state of the literature on bone defects is reviewed here, with a focus on defining critical-size bone defect, the use of the induced membrane technique, the role of biologics, and the management of infected bone defects.

Featured in the 2026-09-07 issue.

← Complications Associated With Internal Fixation of High-Energ…Management of Monteggia Injuries in the Pediatric Patient. →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.