Single vs 2-Stage Revision for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

J Arthroplasty · Mar 2020 · Review

Kildow BJ, Della-Valle CJ, Springer BD

OrthoCarolina Hip and Knee Center, Charlotte, North Carolina

Adult Reconstruction

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONReviews single-stage versus 2-stage revision for chronic periprosthetic joint infection, noting no randomized prospective trials compare eradication or function, and summarizes current evidence to guide surgical decision-making.
Abstract, as published

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most devastating complications following total joint arthroplasty, accounting for a projected 10,000 revision surgeries per year by 2030. Chronic PJI is complicated by the presence of bacterial biofilm, requiring removal of components, thorough debridement, and administration of antibiotics for effective eradication. Chronic PJI is currently managed with single-stage or 2-stage revision surgery. To date, there are no randomized, prospective studies available evaluating eradication rates and functional outcomes between the 2 techniques. In this review, both treatment options are described with the most current literature to guide effective surgical decision-making that is cost-effective while decreasing patient morbidity.

Featured in the 2026-10-23 issue.

← Surgical Options and Approaches for Septic Arthritis of the N…Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.