Alignment in total knee arthroplasty.

Bone Joint J · Mar 2020 · Review

Oussedik S, Abdel MP, Victor J, Pagnano MW, Haddad FS

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester

Adult Reconstruction

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONThis short review outlines TKA alignment targets (mechanical, kinematic, and hybrid functional alignment) in the context of ongoing patient dissatisfaction, weighing mechanical soundness against respect for the soft tissue envelope.
Abstract, as published

Dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty is a well-documented phenomenon. Although many factors have been implicated, including modifiable and nonmodifiable patient factors, emphasis over the past decade has been on implant alignment and stability as both a cause of, and a solution to, this problem. Several alignment targets have evolved with a proliferation of techniques following the introduction of computer and robotic-assisted surgery. Mechanical alignment targets may achieve mechanically-sound alignment while ignoring the soft tissue envelope; kinematic alignment respects the soft tissue envelope while ignoring the mechanical environment. Functional alignment is proposed as a hybrid technique to allow mechanically-sound, soft tissue-friendly alignment targets to be identified and achieved. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(3):276-279.

Featured in the 2026-10-19 issue.

← Complications and outcome after periacetabular osteotomy - in…Ten Flaws of Systematic Mechanical Alignment Total Knee Arthr… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.