Deriving Evidence from Secondary Data in Hand Surgery: Strengths, Limitations, and Future Directions.

Hand Clin · May 2020 · Review

Squitieri L, Chung KC

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine

Hand & Upper Extremity

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONHand surgery researchers must employ novel strategies to overcome missing data limitations in secondary analyses to improve quality of care studies.
Abstract, as published

Health services research using secondary data is a powerful tool for guiding quality/performance measure development, payment reform, and health policy. Patient preferences, physical examination findings, use of postoperative care, and other factors specific to hand surgery research are critical pieces of information required to study quality of care and improve patient outcomes. These data often are missing from data sets, causing limitations and challenges when performing secondary data analyses in hand surgery. As the role of secondary data in surgical research expands, hand surgeons must apply novel strategies and become involved in collaborative initiatives to overcome the limitations of existing resources.

Featured in the 2026-06-30 issue.

← Rehabilitation after distal radius fractures: is there a need…The Outcomes of Intra-Articular Distal Humerus Open Reduction… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.