Outcomes Measurement in Global Hand Surgery.

J Hand Surg Am · Sep 2020 · Review

Bernstein DN, Agarwal-Harding KJ, Dyer GSM, Rozental TD

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA

Hand & Upper Extremity

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONArgues that contextually appropriate patient-reported outcome measures can help low- and middle-income countries track treatment success, assess cost-effectiveness, and build capacity in hand surgery.
Abstract, as published

The global burden of musculoskeletal trauma is high. There is a need to improve access to safe, high-quality surgery in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Numerous initiatives have taken aim at solving this underlying shortage in surgical care, including mission trips, academic programs, and international collaborations. However, much work remains to be done in LMICs compared with high-income countries (HICs). In HICs, the field of hand surgery has grown partially owing to the rigorous application of clinical research to examine outcomes and determine best practices. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have a key role as a valid patient-centered method of capturing symptoms and well-being. They have substantial promise in LMICs to understand patient symptom severity and quality of life better, monitor treatment success or failure, determine cost-effectiveness of procedures, and guide capacity building. Contextually appropriate PROMs can improve routine follow-up in LMICs and advance the practice and study of hand surgery worldwide.

Featured in the 2026-10-09 issue.

← Using Evidence for Hand Surgery: How to Practice Evidence-Bas…Management of de Quervain Tenosynovitis: A Critical Analysis … →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.