Nuts and Bolts of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Orthopaedics.

J Arthroplasty · Apr 2023 · Review

Lee MK, Zaniletti I, Larson DR, Lewallen DG, Berry DJ, Maradit Kremers H

Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

General Orthopaedics

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONThis paper reviews the development, validation, and practical use of patient-reported outcome measures in orthopaedic research, using the KOOS as a working example.
Abstract, as published

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are commonly used in orthopaedic clinical practice, comparative effectiveness research (CER), and label claims. In this paper, we provide an overview of PROs, their development, validation, and use in orthopaedic research with examples and conclude with practical guidelines for researchers and reviewers. We discuss considerations for conceptual framework, validity, reliability, factor analysis, and measurement of change with Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score (KOOS), as an example. We also describe advantages of instruments developed based on item response theory and statistical analyses for data collected using PRO measures. Please visit the following (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p-DtZgUHOA&t=354s) for a video that explains the highlights of the paper in practical terms.

Featured in the 2026-09-07 issue.

← Physician-Review Websites in Orthopaedic Surgery.Auditing the microbiological quality of the air in operating … →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.