Reliability of two-point discrimination measurements

J Hand Surg Am · 1987 · Classic · cited 306 times

A. Lee Dellon, Susan E. Mackinnon, Page McDonald Crosby

Hand & Upper Extremity

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONTwo observers testing 30 nerve-injured patients agreed within 1 mm on moving two-point discrimination 93% of the time and static 87% of the time, supporting good interobserver reliability with a standardized protocol.
Abstract, as published

Both moving and static two-point discrimination are valid measurements of functional sensibility in the hand. The present study investigated the interobserver variability of these measurements when two observers used the same testing instrument and the same definition of the testing procedure's end point. In testing 30 nerve-injured patients, interobserver variability was found to vary within 1 mm, or less, for moving two-point discrimination in 93.3% of the measurements and for static two-point discrimination in 86.8% of the measurements. In only two of the 30 measurements of moving two-point discrimination and in four of the measurements for static two-point discrimination were interobserver differences equal to 2 mm. Measurements for both moving and static two-point discrimination were analyzed statistically by linear regression and correlation co-efficient techniques. The measurements for two-point discrimination obtained with the protocol employed in this study were found to have an interobserver reliability at the p less than 0.00001 level.

Featured in the 2026-10-01 issue.

← Safe Zones for Percutaneous Carpal Tunnel Release.Arthroscopic Training: Historical Insights and Future Directi… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.