Evolution of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Design Rationales and Where We Are Now.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg · Jan 15 2025 · Review

Shah AA, Sheth M, McKee M, Lederman E

From the Banner University Medical Group, University of Arizona - College of Medicine, Phoenix, WA (Sheth)

Shoulder & Elbow

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONThis review traces the evolution of reverse shoulder arthroplasty designs from Grammont-style to lateralized implants and summarizes how component design and positioning affect functional outcomes and complications.
Abstract, as published

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) will soon reach its 20-year anniversary in the United States and has now become the most performed shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. The evolution from Grammont style implants to lateralized designs continues to generate debate as comparable outcomes have been reported with both types of systems. While early literature focused on fixation and expanded indications, recent studies have evaluated component design and position and their effect on functional outcomes and complications. The purpose of this article was to provide a synopsis of design rationales of current RSA prostheses and review outcomes related to RSA design and position.

Featured in the 2026-08-16 issue.

← Consensus on the preoperative management of patients with chr…Preoperative Proximal Migration of the Radial Head as an Inde… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.