Machine learning in the diagnosis, management, and care of patients with low back pain: a scoping review of the literature and future directions.

Spine J · Jan 2025 · Review

Seas A, Zachem TJ, Valan B, Goertz C, Nischal S, Chen SF, et al.

Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham

Spine

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONThis scoping review of 223 studies found machine learning is increasingly used for low back pain diagnosis and prognosis but often lacks rigorous validation, external testing, and reproducible code, limiting clinical readiness.
Abstract, as published

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Low back pain (LBP) remains the leading cause of disability globally. In recent years, machine learning (ML) has emerged as a potentially useful tool to aid the diagnosis, management, and prognostication of LBP.

PURPOSE: In this review, we assess the scope of ML applications in the LBP literature and outline gaps and opportunities.

METHODS: Articles were extracted from the Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and IEEE Xplore databases. Title/abstract and full-text screening was performed by two reviewers. Data on model type, model inputs, predicted outcomes, and ML methods were collected.

RESULTS: In total, 223 unique studies published between 1988 and 2023 were identified, with just over 50% focused on low-back-pain detection. Neural networks were used in 106 of these articles. Common inputs included patient history, demographics, and lab values (67% total). Articles published after 2010 were also likely to incorporate imaging data into their models (41.7% of articles). Of the 212 supervised learning articles identified, 168 (79.4%) mentioned use of a training or testing dataset, 116 (54.7%) utilized cross-validation, and 46 (21.7%) implemented hyperparameter optimization. Of all articles, only 8 included external validation and 9 had publicly available code.

CONCLUSIONS: Despite the rapid application of ML in LBP research, a majority of articles do not follow standard ML best practices. Furthermore, over 95% of articles cannot be reproduced or authenticated due to lack of code availability. Increased collaboration and code sharing are needed to support future growth and implementation of ML in the care of patients with LBP.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A scoping review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines.

Featured in the 2026-08-29 issue.

← The Sacroiliac Joint: A Current State-of-the-Art Review.Lumbar Disc Replacement Provides Indirect Decompression as Ef… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.