Lateralization and inclination angle in reverse arthroplasty-what do we know?

Shoulder Elbow · Oct 2024 · Review

Ekelund AL, Poncet D

R & D Shoulder Reconstruction, DePuySynthes, Raynham

Shoulder & Elbow

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONThis review notes that decreasing inclination and increasing lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty reduce notching but lack strong evidence for improved rotation and raise risks of glenoid loosening and acromial fractures.
Abstract, as published

Since the original Grammont design of a reverse shoulder arthroplasty there has been a trend to decrease inclination angle from 155° to 145 or 135°. Furthermore, lateralization on the glenoid side has been advocated. These changes decrease the risk for impingement between humerus and the inferior part of the glenoid (notching). These changes were also made to improve restoration of rotation. However, there is very little evidence that rotation has improved due to these changes. A negative effect of lateralization is that it increases the risk for glenoid loosening. Furthermore, the stress on acromion increases which may lead to more acromion or scapula spine fractures. More randomized studies are needed to define optimal design of a reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Featured in the 2026-09-29 issue.

← Scoping review: Evidence for long-term follow-up and monitori…Rotator Cuff Tears Part I: Diagnosis, Nonoperative Management… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.