Current concepts of fourth-generation minimally invasive and open hallux valgus surgery.

Bone Joint J · Jan 01 2025 · Review

Lewis TL, Barakat A, Mangwani J, Ramasamy A, Ray R

King's Foot and Ankle Unit, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Foot & Ankle

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONReview finds minimally invasive and open (Scarf/Akin) hallux valgus surgery give similar outcomes, with MIS offering smaller scars and less early pain, but evidence is mostly single-surgeon series and recurrence remains a challenge.
Abstract, as published

Hallux valgus (HV) presents as a common forefoot deformity that causes problems with pain, mobility, footwear, and quality of life. The most common open correction used in the UK is the Scarf and Akin osteotomy, which has good clinical and radiological outcomes and high levels of patient satisfaction when used to treat a varying degrees of deformity. However, there are concerns regarding recurrence rates and long-term outcomes. Minimally invasive or percutaneous surgery (MIS) has gained popularity, offering the potential for similar clinical and radiological outcomes with reduced postoperative pain and smaller scars. Despite this, MIS techniques vary widely, hindering comparison and standardization. This review evaluates the evidence for both open Scarf and Akin osteotomy and newer-generation MIS techniques. Fourth-generation MIS emphasizes multiplanar rotational deformity correction through stable fixation. While MIS techniques show promise, their evidence mainly comprises single-surgeon case series. Comparative studies between open and MIS techniques suggest similar clinical and radiological outcomes, although MIS may offer advantages in scar length and less early postoperative pain. MIS may afford superior correction in severe deformity and lower recurrence rates due to correcting the bony deformity rather than soft-tissue correction. Recurrence remains a challenge in HV surgery, necessitating long-term follow-up and standardized outcome measures for assessment. Any comparison between the techniques requires comparative studies. Surgeons must weigh the advantages and risks of both open and MIS approaches in collaboration with patients to determine the most suitable treatment.

Featured in the 2026-10-05 issue.

← Posterior Tibial Tendon Insufficiency: Which Ligaments are In…Calcaneus Fractures: A Review of Management, Treatment, and R… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.