Comparison of individually packed metalwork and on-the-tray metalwork: A review of clinical risks.

J Hand Surg Eur Vol · Jul 2025 · Review

Chong HH, Dehbozorgi S, Bodansky D, Trickett R

Hand Unit, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK

General Orthopaedics

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONThis review finds no clinical evidence that re-sterilized on-the-tray metalwork raises infection or implant failure rates in trauma surgery, while individually packed implants add cost, contamination risk, operative time, and carbon footprint.
Abstract, as published

The use of metalwork, such as screws and plates, is common in orthopaedic trauma surgery, with a recent trend towards individually packed metalwork owing to concerns about sterilization efficacy and traceability. Despite this, there is no clinical evidence proving clinical risk from repeat sterilization of metalworks used in orthopaedic trauma of either increased infection rates or loosening or implant failure. On the contrary, the use of individually packed metalworks presents several practical challenges, including higher costs, increased risks of contamination, longer operative times and a larger carbon footprint. This review underscores the need for further validation of individually packed metalwork in orthopaedic trauma surgery.

Featured in the 2026-08-18 issue.

← A Review of Surgical Irrigation Solutions for Infection Preve…Misconceptions of Work-Life Balance in Orthopaedic Surgery: A… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.