The Role of Cadaver-Based Laboratories Versus 3 Dimensional Virtual Training in Surgical Teaching.

Hand Clin · May 2025 · Review

Burnier M, Cievet-Bonfils M

Hôpital Privé Médipôle, Ramsay Group, Villeurbanne; Infirmerie Protestante, France

General Orthopaedics

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONNarrative review contrasting cadaver-based laboratories with 3D virtual, digital box, and robotic training as alternatives to the traditional master-apprentice model, given specimen access limits and evolving surgical technology.
Abstract, as published

The conventional approach to surgical training has long followed a master-apprentice model, where experienced surgeons teach trainees in a patient-involved setting. This method has effectively educated surgeons for many years. However, the swift advancement in surgical methodologies and shifts in health care dynamics have revealed significant shortcomings in this traditional model. Surgeons have traditionally honed their skills by practicing on specimens. However, the challenge of obtaining specimens, accompanied by recent major technological advancements, has led to the creation of innovative training methods, including 3 dimensional virtual training, digital box training, and robotic surgery training.

Featured in the 2026-10-15 issue.

← Hounsfield Units for Assessing Bone Mineral Density and Stren…

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.