International consensus on the content of prehabilitation in spine surgery: results of a nominal group technique.

Spine J · Jan 2026 · Review

Janssen ERC, Eubanks JE, Schneider MJ, Smeets RJEM, Skolasky RL, Participants NGT

Orthopaedic Surgery and Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Surgical Outcomes Research Center, Johns Hopkins University

Spine

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONA 50-participant international consensus process ranked five prehabilitation themes for spine surgery, with education and psychological preparation prioritized, to guide design of programs aimed at improving postoperative recovery.
Abstract, as published

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Spine surgery, like all major surgeries, carries the risk of adverse events and delayed recovery. Prehabilitation programs may mitigate negative prognostic factors to reduce complications and promote faster recovery postoperatively following spine surgery. There is no international consensus or recommendations regarding prehabilitation components in spine surgery.

PURPOSE: This study aims to establish international consensus on important modalities of prehabilitation before spine surgery for patients appropriate for prehabilitation using a modified nominal group technique (NGT).

PATIENT SAMPLE: This study used a modified NGT to establish consensus among 50 participants during the International Forum for Back and Neck Pain (ILBP Forum) 2023 and International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine (ISSLS) 2024 conference.

OUTCOME MEASURES: The rank for each theme and component was computed as the mean of the ranking. We expressed the dispersion in ranking as a measure of consensus.

METHODS: During the workshops participants consisting of clinicians and researchers ranked themes and components of a prehabilitation intervention for patients scheduled for spine surgery. The rank for each theme and component was calculated as the mean rank, the dispersion in rankings was used as a measure of consensus.

RESULTS: Five main prehabilitation themes were identified and ranked from most to least important by the participants: education (consensus=0.65), psychological prehabilitation (consensus=0.56), physical prehabilitation (consensus=0.37), multidisciplinary prehabilitation (consensus=0.54) and lifestyle factors (consensus=0.53). Within themes, different prehabilitation components were identified and ranked by priority.

CONCLUSIONS: The 5 themes identified by this NGT consensus process (education, psychological prehabilitation, physical prehabilitation, multidisciplinary prehabilitation and lifestyle factors) can help inform the design of innovative prehabilitation interventions for optimizing recovery from spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A modified NGT.

Read the article: PubMed · Publisher (DOI)

Featured in the 2026-10-20 issue.

← On growth and scoliosis.Age-Specific Risk Factors and Time to New Vertebral Fractures… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.