Current Practice and Evidence for Endoscopic Spine Surgery.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg · Jan 15 2026 · Review

Lewandrowski KU, Pittman J, Joseph S, Kim C, Yeung C, Vaccaro A

From the Division Personalized Pain Research and Education, Center for Advanced Spine Care of Southern Arizona, Tucson,…

Spine

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONThis review examines endoscopic spine surgery (transforaminal, interlaminar, biportal), comparing outcomes with open surgery and addressing patient selection, learning curve, complications, and research gaps.
Abstract, as published

Endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) represents a development in minimally invasive procedures, offering the potential benefits of reduced tissue disruption, shorter recovery times, and enhanced precision. This review traces the historical development of ESS, explores its core techniques-including transforaminal, interlaminar, and biportal approaches-and evaluates its role in treating conditions like herniated disks and spinal stenosis. By comparing clinical outcomes of ESS with standard open surgery, this article highlights the importance of patient selection, surgeon expertise, and evidence-based practice. Challenges, such as the steep learning curve, limitations in visualization, and risk of complications, are discussed, along with strategies for integrating ESS into modern spine care. The review concludes by identifying research gaps and opportunities for technological advancements, aiming to guide surgeons in adopting ESS and improving patient outcomes.

Featured in the 2026-11-08 issue.

← What do we mean by 'self-management' for chronic low back pai…Longitudinal Discordance Between Functional Recovery and Pati… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.