Chiropractic Care and Spinal Manipulation: Evidence, Risks, and Referral Considerations for Spine Surgeons.

JBJS Rev · Dec 01 2025 · Review

Basques BA, Ma S, Sadh P, Daniels AH, Perez-Albela A

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Rhode Island

Spine

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONSpinal manipulation has reasonable evidence for acute-to-chronic low back pain as part of multimodal care, but weaker support for neck pain or extremity conditions, with rare serious adverse events and inconsistent safety reporting.
Abstract, as published

» Most evidence in low back pain (LBP): Evidence supports spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) as a conservative option for acute, subacute, and chronic LBP, especially when used as part of multimodal care.» Limited role beyond LBP: SMT shows insufficient or conflicting evidence for neck pain, headaches, extremity disorders, and is not recommended for nonmusculoskeletal conditions.» Risk profile: Serious adverse events are rare and may be underreported; minor, transient soreness is more common. Careful screening for contraindications (e.g., trauma, connective tissue disease, vascular disorders) is critical.» Ongoing gaps: Variability in practice standards, inconsistent informed consent, and poor adverse event reporting limit clarity on true effectiveness and safety.

Featured in the 2026-07-31 issue.

← Lumbar Adjacent Segment Disease: A Modern Perspective and Rev…Cement augmentation of pedicle screw constructs as a modifier… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.