Peer Review in Upper-Extremity Surgery: Essential Strategies for Reviewers.

J Hand Surg Am · Jun 2026 · Review

Rahman R, Grandizio LC, Melamed E

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY

Hand & Upper Extremity

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONOffers practical guidance for peer reviewers in hand/upper-extremity surgery, covering manuscript evaluation strategies, bias, conflicts of interest, and common methodological pitfalls.
Abstract, as published

In this review, we aim to discuss the history and future of the peer-review process within hand and upper-extremity surgery. In addition, this review will serve as a practical "how to" guide for reviewers by providing strategies and insights aimed at improving the quality of manuscript reviews. Prereview considerations, such as content, statistical expertise, bias, and potential conflicts of interest, will be addressed. Topics relative to each manuscript section will be presented including common methodological errors.

Featured in the 2026-07-29 issue.

← Application of Artificial Dermis Combined With a Medial Flap …Do Preoperative Intra-Articular Steroid Injections Affect the… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.