Insurance Denials: A Comprehensive Review and Navigating the Peer Review Process.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg · May 15 2026 · Review

Berger RJ, Gaudiani MA, Fortin PT, Taliaferro K

From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Henry Ford Health, MI (Berger and Fortin)

General Orthopaedics

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONThis review examines the legal/ethical issues, burdens on physicians and patients, and improvement strategies for insurance prior authorization and peer-to-peer denial processes.
Abstract, as published

Insurance companies and third-party reviewers use the peer review process including prior authorization (PA) and the peer-to-peer (P2P) process to manage healthcare costs and ensure appropriate care, citing principles of value-based care. As the volume of initial denials increases, physicians face notable time burdens and increased administrative costs while patients can incur delays and possibly worse health outcomes. We aim to explore the legal and ethical framework of utilization management; examine the effect on treating physicians, patients, and reviewers; offer suggestions for navigating peer-to-peer reviews; and propose future directions and improvement opportunities.

Featured in the 2026-07-30 issue.

← Management of Stress Fractures in Ballet.Radiation Exposure in Orthopaedics. →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.