Evaluation of rotational profile and foot loading in the uninvolved leg of children with unilateral clubfoot treated with foot abduction orthoses.

J Pediatr Orthop B · Jun 03 2026 · Recent

Lawing CR, Bailey CE, Garg S, Aguilera Flores J, Bailey JM, Saraswat P, et al.

Shriners Hospitals for Children

Pediatric Orthopaedics Foot & Ankle Orthopaedic Trauma

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONUninvolved legs in unilateral clubfoot show external hip rotation and bimalleolar axis changes but no clinically significant impact on thigh-foot angle or foot loading.
Abstract, as published

Ponseti treatment of congenital clubfoot utilizes foot abduction bracing to prevent recurrence. In unilateral clubfoot, families have expressed concern about inducing deformity in the uninvolved leg. This study evaluated rotational profiles of uninvolved legs in children with unilateral clubfoot. We retrospectively reviewed 78 children (mean age: 9.5 ± 3.4 years) with unilateral idiopathic clubfoot treated by Ponseti method at a single institution from 2008 to 2025. Motion capture kinematics evaluated hip, tibial, ankle rotation, and foot progression angle (FPA). Physical exam evaluated bimalleolar axis, hip rotation, and thigh-foot angle (TFA). Pedobarographic data evaluated FPA and foot loading. Results compared to normative cohorts of typically developing children using unpaired t-tests (P < 0.05). The uninvolved side demonstrated more kinematic internal ankle rotation (3.9 ± 7.3 vs. 0.9 ± 5.6°; P = 0.0004), more kinematic external hip rotation (-4.4 ± 9.6 vs. 1.2 ± 6.8°; P = 0.0001), less hip internal rotation on exam (47.4 ± 13.2 vs. 57.6 ± 12.3°; P = 0.0001) and more external bimalleolar axis (-19.0 ± 6.8 vs. -16.0 ± 5.9°; P = 0.0091). There was no difference in TFA or FPA. Pedobarographic analysis showed no foot loading or FPA impact. The uninvolved limb in unilateral clubfoot develops statistically significant external hip rotation and increased external bimalleolar axis compared to normative controls, though kinematic tibial internal rotation was not significantly different. However, there was no significant impact on TFA, FPA, or foot loading, indicating that these differences are clinically insignificant. Awareness of these changes is helpful for counseling and reassuring families. This is a level III retrospective case-control study.

Featured in the 2026-06-24 issue.

← Evaluation of Language Diversity Among Orthopaedic Surgeons.Limb occlusion pressure adjusted tourniquet use results in ad… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.