Factors associated with return-to-sport outcomes following pathogen-confirmed acute respiratory infections in athletes: AWARE X study.

Br J Sports Med · Jun 19 2026 · Recent

Jooste M, Sewry N, Valtonen M, Dyer M, Jordaan E, Schwellnus M

Sport Exercise Medicine and Lifestyle Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

Sports Medicine

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONAfter confirmed respiratory infections in athletes, longer return-to-sport was linked to amateur status, greater severity, and influenza/SARS-CoV-2 versus rhinovirus.
Abstract, as published

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with return-to-sport (RTS) outcomes following confirmed acute respiratory infections (ARinf) in athletes.

METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 114 confirmed ARinf cases among athletic individuals. Causative pathogens were identified using multiplex PCR testing, and illness severity was classified per International Olympic Committee consensus (mild, moderate and severe). RTS outcomes included time (days) to return-to-training (RTT), return-to-full-training (RTFT) and return-to-full-performance (RTFP). Cox regression models (HRs) assessed associations between RTS outcomes and demographics, sport participation, pathogen groups and illness severity.

RESULTS: The median (IQR) days to RTT were 3.5 (0-7), RTFT 8 (6-11) and RTFP 11 (7-14). Amateur athletes had prolonged RTS outcomes (HR range=0.51-0.59; p≤0.03) compared with professional athletes. RTS outcomes differed between the most common pathogen groups: influenza and SARS-CoV-2 had longer RTS than rhinovirus (HR range=0.11-0.23; p≤0.003). Severe illness was associated with prolonged RTS outcomes compared with mild and moderate illnesses (HR range=0.17-0.31; p<0.0001). Pathogen-related differences in RTS persisted within each severity group. Within mild/moderate illnesses, the influenza/SARS-CoV-2 subgroup had longer RTS than rhinovirus (HRs: RTT=0.35; RTFT=0.05; RTFP=0.06; p<0.05) and within severe illnesses (HRs: RTT=0.23; RTFT=0.21; RTFP=0.13; p≤0.01).

CONCLUSION: Factors associated with RTS outcomes following ARinf in athletes are level of sport participation, illness severity at presentation and the causative pathogen. Clinical assessment of illness severity remains valuable in RTS decision-making, particularly in low-resource settings. However, identifying the causative pathogen may provide additional predictive value and refine RTS clinical decision-making.

Featured in the 2026-06-20 issue.

← Comparison of 90-Day Medical Complications, Emergency Departm…An analysis of 140 injuries to the superior glenoid labrum →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.