Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty Following Prior Internal Fixation: A Comparison with Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

J Arthroplasty · Jul 02 2026 · Recent

Hali K, Manzo MA, Entezari B, Ravi B, Lex JR

Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Canada

Adult Reconstruction Orthopaedic Trauma

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONConversion THA following prior fracture fixation shows outcomes between primary and revision THA, with higher transfusion rates and longer operative times.
Abstract, as published

BACKGROUND: With rising life expectancy, the incidence of total hip arthroplasty (THA) following prior femoral and/or acetabular fracture fixation is increasing. Conversion THA (cTHA) following these procedures is technically complex and associated with unique challenges. However, direct comparisons between primary (pTHA), conversion (cTHA), and revision (rTHA) THA remain limited.

METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study comparing intraoperative and postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing cTHA from April 2012 to October 2022. This was defined as THA following previous fixation with hardware present in the femur or acetabulum, including previous acetabular open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), femoral intramedullary nail, sliding hip screw, or blade plate. After propensity score-matching to pTHA and rTHA, each group included 148 patients. Outcomes were analyzed using odds ratios and hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Kaplan-Meier and adjusted Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to assess reoperation- and revision-free survival.

RESULTS: Compared with cTHA, pTHA demonstrated a lower risk of reoperation (P = 0.03), whereas there was no significant difference to rTHA (P = 0.42). Intraoperatively, cTHA demonstrated higher odds of transfusion compared with pTHA (P < 0.01), but similar to rTHA (P = 0.06). Operative duration for cTHA (124.3 minutes, range, 70 to 250) was longer than pTHA (93.5 minutes, range, 56 to 142; P < 0.01), but shorter than rTHA (177.3 minutes, range, 79 to 392; P < 0.01). The mean lengths of stay for cTHA (3.3 days, range, one to 17) were longer than pTHA (2.5 days, range, zero to eight; P < 0.01), but similar to rTHA (3.4 days, range one to 17; P = 0.92).

CONCLUSION: This study establishes cTHA as a distinct surgical category with perioperative and postoperative risks between those of pTHA and rTHA, underscoring the need to classify it separately for surgical planning, resource allocation, and patient counseling.

Featured in the 2026-07-16 issue.

← Short-term survivorship of a novel acetabular component with …Custom Pelvic Implants in Complex Total Hip Arthroplasty. →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.