Evaluating differences in the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) tilt angle between adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with Lenke 1-ve (flexible) and Lenke 1 +ve (stiff) curves.

Eur Spine J · Jul 04 2026 · Recent

Lee SY, Ignacio IFD, Leong VJ, Halim NFAA, Chandirasegaran S, Chiu CK, et al.

MalayaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Orthopaedic Centre of Excellence for Research and Learning(NOCERAL),…

Spine

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONRetrospective study finds optimal upper instrumented vertebra tilt angles differ significantly by level and curve flexibility in Lenke 1 adolescent scoliosis, guiding UIV selection.
Abstract, as published

PURPOSE: To analyse the mean optimal upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) tilt angle in Lenke 1 subgroups with UIV at T2, T3, and T4, as derived from preoperative supervised cervical supine side-bending radiographs.

METHODS: This retrospective study included 288 Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion between 2020 and 2023, with UIV selected at T2, T3, or T4 levels. All patients were categorised into two subgroups: Lenke 1-ve (flexible) (proximal thoracic side bending (PTSB) Cobb angle: <15°) and Lenke 1 + ve (stiff) (PTSB Cobb angle: 15°-24.9°). Primary radiological parameters analysed included optimal UIV tilt angle (derived from preoperative supervised cervical supine side-bending radiographs), intraoperative UIV tilt angle, proximal thoracic (PT), main thoracic (MT), and thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) Cobb angles, T1 tilt, clavicle angle (Cla-A), cervical axis (CA), and coronal balance (CB).

RESULTS: The optimal UIV tilt angle demonstrated excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability (ICC:0.890; 0.863). Lenke 1-ve and 1 + ve groups demonstrated different UIV level distributions (p < 0.001). In Lenke 1-ve group, the UIV levels were primarily at T3 (74.4%), followed by T4 (16.5%), and T2 (9.0%). Meanwhile, Lenke 1 + ve group had UIV at T3 (54.8%), followed by T2 (41.9%), and T4 (3.2%). The mean optimal UIV tilt differed significantly at T2, T3, and T4 for Lenke 1-ve group (-2.9°±3.9°, -5.2°±2.8°, -5.4°±1.5°) and Lenke 1 + ve group (-3.3°±2.7°; -5.4°±2.9°, -7.4°±5.2°) (p < 0.05). UIV level, apical vertebra level, and preoperative MT Cobb angle were significant predictive factors for optimal UIV tilt angle (p < 0.05). Patients with a negative preoperative T1 tilt had a more distal UIV level selected.

CONCLUSION: Lenke 1 + ve (stiff) group had a more proximal UIV level selected than Lenke 1-ve (flexible) group. Notably, UIV levels at T2, T3, and T4 demonstrated significantly different mean optimal UIV tilt angles, with more negative tilt magnitudes as the selection progressed caudally.

Featured in the 2026-07-26 issue.

← Lumbar Disc Disorders and Low-Back Pain: Socioeconomic Factor…Responsiveness of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale in Patients w… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.