Clinical and Economic Burden of Poor Bone Health in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976) · Jun 26 2026 · Recent

Passias PG, Daher M, Chatzis KD, Lafage V, Lafage R, Nayak P, et al.

Division of Spine Surgery, Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine

Spine Orthopaedic Trauma

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONPoor bone health significantly increases proximal junctional failure, revision surgery, and healthcare costs in adult spinal deformity surgery.
Abstract, as published

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare clinical and economic outcomes for ASD patients with poor-bone-health versus those with normal-bone-health.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Osteoporosis is a common comorbidity in the adult spinal deformity (ASD) population, with a reported prevalence of 14-29%.

METHODS: Patients were categorized into five guideline-concordant cohorts: Confirmed-Osteoporosis (COP: patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis based on DEXA values or a formal preoperative diagnosis); Fracture Osteoporosis (Fx: patients with fragility fractures); Fracture-without-confirmed-Osteoporosis (FXNO: patients with fragility fractures but no osteopenia/osteoporosis diagnosis based on DEXA/formal documentation); Confirmed/fracture-osteoporosis (COP/FX: patients with fragility fractures and/or osteopenia/osteoporosis by DEXA/diagnosis); and the Normal cohort (Nm: patients with normal bone health and no fragility fractures). Cost analyses were performed using multivariate linear regression controlling for BMI, diabetes, baseline deformity (T1PA), and levels fused. Multivariate logistic regression assessed risk of reoperation/complications between groups while controlling for BMI, diabetes, baseline deformity (T1PA), and levels fused.

RESULTS: Overall, 205 patients were included in the Fx-cohort, 136 patients in the COP-cohort, 115 patients in the FXNO-cohort, and 71 patients Nm-cohort. Compared with the Nm-cohort, osteoporotic-cohorts demonstrated significantly worse baseline spinopelvic alignment and higher comorbidity burden. Fx and FXNO cohorts had higher rates of PJF (Fx: 11.2% vs 1.4%, aOR 7.8; FXNO: 10.4% vs 1.4%, aOR 9.0) and revision surgery (Fx: 19.5% vs 7.0%, aOR 2.8; FXNO: 22.6% vs 7.0%, aOR 3.6). Osteoporotic cohorts demonstrated significantly higher short-term QALYs at 6 weeks (P<0.05) with no difference in the long term. Revision surgery averaged $95,117 per case, translating into an estimated $4.0 million potential-cost-savings.

CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the clinical and economic burden of untreated poor bone quality in the setting of ASD surgery. Proactive medical management is crucial to mitigate complications, reduce revisions, and significantly lower healthcare costs in ASD surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of the prospectively enrolled, multicenter ASD database.

Featured in the 2026-07-11 issue.

← Development and psychometric validation of the short-form tha…2009 Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the … →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.