Peptide Supplements and Their Therapeutic Applications in Sports Medicine.

Am J Sports Med · Aug 11 2026 · Recent

Tewari K, Liu TP, Im C, Hamad C, Petrigliano F, Cheung EC, et al.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles

Sports Medicine

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONA scoping review finds popular musculoskeletal peptide supplements (BPC-157, TB-500, CJC-1295, MK-677, ipamorelin, GHK-Cu) lack robust human efficacy/safety data and carry risks like cardiovascular and metabolic complications, so they shouldn't replace standard orthopaedic care.
Abstract, as published

BACKGROUND: The peptide supplement market has experienced rapid growth due to marketing claims of enhanced performance and accelerated recovery from musculoskeletal injury. These peptides are increasingly popular with patients and athletes and are often perceived as low risk, despite the absence of efficacy or safety data for many emerging peptides.

PURPOSE: To summarize existing peer-reviewed data on 6 emerging peptides (BPC-157, thymosin beta-4 or TB-500, CJC-1295, MK-677, ipamorelin, and GHK-Cu [copper peptide]) for musculoskeletal recovery and enhancement in animal and human models.

METHODS: Three independent reviewers searched the PubMed database using permutations of peptide search terms (BPC-157, TB-500, CJC-1295, MK-677 [ibutamoren], ipamorelin, and GHK-Cu) combined with musculoskeletal tissue search terms (bone, fracture, muscle, tendon, ligament, meniscus, and cartilage) following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Papers were independently screened by 2 reviewers, with a third serving as a tiebreaker. Papers examining these peptides for musculoskeletal treatment, tissue recovery, or performance in animal or human models were included.

RESULTS: Overall, 67% of identified publications utilized preclinical animal models. In animal models, most commonly rats, each compound demonstrated unique mechanisms with promising but variable effects on tendon, muscle, bone, and ligament healing. Human clinical studies were limited to a handful of investigations, most lacking robust controls or rigorous study designs. Human data were heterogeneous and revealed modest improvements at best for metabolic bone health and degenerative knee pain. Some peptides such as MK-677 were associated with significant risks including congestive heart failure, and significant heterogeneity existed in dosing and route of administration.

CONCLUSION: Despite promising findings in animal studies, the claimed benefits of emerging peptide supplements for musculoskeletal recovery and performance remain unsubstantiated by current human trials. Documented risks include cardiovascular complications and metabolic dysfunction such as insulin resistance. Because of the lack of robust efficacy and safety data, peptide supplements should not currently be recommended as a replacement or adjunct for existing orthopaedic standard of care.

STUDY DESIGN: Scoping review.

Featured in the 2026-08-21 issue.

← Effects of neurocognitive reactive activities on upper extrem…Fatty Infiltration and Atrophy of the Rotator Cuff do not Imp… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.