Computed tomography based three-dimensional analysis of side-to-side differences between metacarpals.

J Hand Surg Eur Vol · Aug 18 2026 · Recent

Sutter N, Wanivenhaus C, Götschi T, Schweizer A, Estermann L

Department of Orthopedics, Hand Surgery Division, Balgrist University Hospital, Switzerland

Hand & Upper Extremity Orthopaedic Trauma

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTION3D CT analysis of 20 healthy hands found only minor bilateral metacarpal asymmetries (notably in pronation/supination), suggesting contralateral bone is generally a reliable template for surgical planning.
Abstract, as published

INTRODUCTION: Metacarpal fractures can cause shortening, rotational, or angular deformities, which may impair function and potentially require surgical correction. CT-assisted preoperative planning frequently references the contralateral metacarpal for alignment purposes. However, there are limited data on the asymmetries between left- and right-hand metacarpals which could influence surgical outcomes.

METHODS: 3D metacarpal bone models were created from CT scans of 20 healthy participants. Each left-hand metacarpal was mirrored and aligned with its corresponding right-hand counterpart. Differences were assessed with respect to pronation/supination, radioulnar deviation, flexion/extension and length.

RESULTS: The mean absolute differences were small but significant, with a mean length difference of 0.6 mm, pronation/supination of 3°, flexion/extension of 1.8° and radial/ulnar deviation of 1.8°. Despite the overall consistency, a small number of outliers were observed for pronation/supination, with differences as high as 10°. The most notable findings among the mean differences were observed in metacarpal pronation/supination, with the left-hand metacarpals being more supinated than the right.

CONCLUSION: There are bilateral asymmetries between the metacarpals, although they are minor and likely to be insignificant in clinical practice. Pronation/supination differences were the most pronounced and should be given particular attention during surgical planning. Surgeons should be aware of these variations and the risk of potential overcorrection or undercorrection.

Featured in the 2026-08-20 issue.

← Iatrogenic Nerve Injuries Affecting Upper Limb Function: Medi…Management Preferences of Geriatric Distal Radius Fractures: … →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.