Distal Radius Articular Surface Visualization: Comparison of Ligament-Sparing Volar and Dorsal Radiocarpal Arthrotomies for Distal Radius Fracture Reduction.

J Hand Surg Am · Aug 20 2026 · Recent

Rakowski DR, Richman EH, Kahan R, Peek KJ, France TJ, Swartwout H, et al.

University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO

Hand & Upper Extremity Orthopaedic Trauma

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONIn cadavers, dorsal radiocarpal arthrotomy visualized more distal radius articular surface than volar (77.3% vs 63.7%), though volar approach better exposed the volar rim—useful for planning exposure based on fracture pattern.
Abstract, as published

PURPOSE: Direct articular surface visualization may improve reduction accuracy in intra-articular distal radius fractures. A ligament-sparing volar radiocarpal arthrotomy has been described to complement the standard volar approach, but the articular surface area (SA) visualized has not been compared to the traditional dorsal radiocarpal arthrotomy. This study quantified and compared articular SA visualization through volar and dorsal ligament-sparing radiocarpal arthrotomies in a cadaveric model.

METHODS: Twenty-four fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens (12 matched pairs) underwent either a volar or dorsal ligament-sparing radiocarpal arthrotomy; one wrist from each pair was randomized to each approach. Visible articular SA was calculated using photogrammetric three-dimensional models created using postarthrotomy images. Radiocarpal disarticulation was performed to calculate total articular SA. Total SA percentage was compared using paired t tests. Regional articular visualization was characterized for each approach by overlay mapping.

RESULTS: Mean percentage of SA visualization was 63.7% (range, 43.9% to 90.7%) via volar radiocarpal arthrotomy and 77.3% (range, 53.1% to 90.9%) via dorsal radiocarpal arthrotomy; the dorsal arthrotomy provided a mean increase in visualization of 13.5% (P = .008). Based on overlay mapping, the volar arthrotomy improved visualization of the volar rim, whereas dorsal arthrotomy improved visualization of the dorsal rim, dorsal-radial scaphoid facet, and dorsal-ulnar lunate facet. There was similar visualization of the central third of the radius, volar-radial scaphoid facet, and volar-ulnar lunate facet.

CONCLUSIONS: Both volar and dorsal arthrotomies provide excellent visualization of the distal radius articular surface, although dorsal arthrotomy provided greater overall visualization. Volar arthrotomy improved exposure of the volar rim, a region commonly involved in volar rim marginal fractures and volar shear intra-articular fractures. The dorsal arthrotomy allowed regional visualization of fracture patterns involving the dorsal-radial styloid, dorsal-ulnar lunate facet, or dorsal rim articular comminution.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Radiocarpal arthrotomies provide a practical direct assessment of the distal radius articular surface without additional incisions or arthroscopic resources.

Featured in the 2026-08-22 issue.

← Nerve Transfers to Rebalance the Spastic Wrist: An Anatomical…Assessment of Scaphoid Screw Centrality Using a Dedicated Axi… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.