Labral Augmentation Decreases Humeral Head Displacement and Cartilage Stress in an Anterior Shoulder Instability Model With Subcritical Glenoid Bone Loss: A Finite Element Analysis.

Arthroscopy · Aug 24 2026 · Recent

Li X, Li B, Feng J, Li B, Wu D, Huang W, et al.

Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

Shoulder & Elbow Sports Medicine

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONFinite element modeling shows labral augmentation better restores native humeral head stability and normal capsule/cartilage stress than Bankart repair with or without remplissage in shoulders with subcritical glenoid bone loss.
Abstract, as published

PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of labral augmentation on glenohumeral biomechanics for anterior glenohumeral instability patients via finite element analysis (FEA).

METHODS: A shoulder finite element model was derived from preoperative computed tomography scans of five patients with anterior shoulder instability and subcritical glenoid bone loss (13.5%-25% of inferior glenoid width). Four models were established based on the affected shoulders, including a model of Bankart lesion combined with subcritical glenoid bone loss, a model of isolated Bankart repair, a model of Bankart repair plus remplissage, and a model of labral augmentation. The contralateral, unaffected shoulders served as normal controls. These five models were tested to assess humeral head displacement and stress on the joint capsule and cartilage.

RESULTS: Labral augmentation outperformed Bankart repair with or without remplissage in restoring native joint characteristics. It limited humeral head displacement to control-like levels (8.10 ± 0.58 vs 7.61 ± 0.46 mm, P = .18), normalized capsular stress (2.00 ± 0.20 vs 1.82 ± 0.23 MPa, P = .221), and reduced cartilage stress on the glenoid and humeral head to pre-injury baselines (glenoid: 2.65 ± 0.18 vs 2.75 ± 0.23 MPa, P = .484; humeral head: 29.70 ± 1.92 vs 30.31 ± 1.93 MPa, P = .630).

CONCLUSIONS: In this FEA of anterior shoulder instability with subcritical bone loss, labral augmentation decreased humeral head displacement and restored articular cartilage stress to an intact state compared to Bankart repair with or without remplissage.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This FEA study suggests labral augmentation in the context of subcritical bone loss may be a viable surgical treatment option for patients with shoulder instability.

Featured in the 2026-08-27 issue.

← Public Perceptions of Robotic-Assisted Shoulder Arthroplasty …An anatomic and mechanical study of the interosseous membrane… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.