Risk Factors for Management Failure Following Incidental Durotomy: Insights from 24,438 Consecutive Spinal Surgeries.

Spine J · Aug 31 2026 · Recent

Jang HJ, Woo J, Kim DK, Moon BJ, Park JY, Kuh SU, et al.

Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Korea

Spine

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONAmong 24,438 spine surgeries with 1,180 incidental durotomies, management failure (3.2%) was driven by prior radiotherapy, revision thoracic OPLL surgery, dural patch use, long-segment fusion, and higher body weight, highlighting high-risk scenarios needing more than primary repair.
Abstract, as published

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Incidental durotomy (IDT) is a frequent intraoperative complication in spine surgery. While most cases are managed successfully with primary repair, management failure leads to persistent symptoms and necessitates secondary intervention, resulting in significantly poorer clinical outcomes.

PURPOSE: To identify independent risk factors for management failure following IDT through a comprehensive analysis of patient demographics, pathological conditions, and surgical approaches.

PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 1,180 patients with confirmed IDT, identified from a continuous series of 24,438 spinal procedures performed between 2011 and 2024.

OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence of IDT and the rate of management failure, defined as the requirement for secondary surgical intervention.

METHODS: To evaluate factors contributing to IDT management failure, the cohort was categorized into three distinct surgical subgroups based on the surgical approach used: anterior cervical, posterior thoracic OPLL (ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament)/OLF (ossification of the ligamentum flavum), and general posterior approaches. A comparative evaluation of clinical, anatomical, and operative variables was performed between the success and failure groups to derive independent predictors of surgical failure.

RESULTS: The overall incidence of IDT was 4.8% (1,180/24,438), with a management failure rate of 3.22% (38/1,180). Failure rates varied by procedure, peaking in anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (13.3%) and posterior thoracic OPLL/OLF surgery (9.5%). In the thoracic OPLL/OLF subgroup, revision surgery (42.9% vs 5.4%, p = 0.015) and a higher OPLL occupying ratio (55.9% vs 16.3%, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with management failure. In minimally invasive procedures, 74.7% of IDTs were successfully managed without primary sutures. In the general posterior approach subgroup, multivariate analysis identified radiotherapy history (OR 14.82, 95% CI 3.12-70.45, p < 0.001), dural patch use (OR 5.32, 95% CI 2.05-13.84, p < 0.001), long-segment surgery (≥ 4 levels) (OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.28-7.62, p = 0.012), and higher body weight (OR 1.04, p = 0.019) as independent predictors of failure.

CONCLUSIONS: Management failure after IDT is driven by patient-specific and anatomical factors. High-risk scenarios-specifically previous radiotherapy, revision thoracic procedures, and severe OPLL-starkly increase this risk, necessitating proactive surgical strategies. To prevent secondary interventions, surgeons must move beyond primary repair alone, optimizing the local environment by obliterating anatomical dead space and ensuring adequate extrinsic tamponade.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A retrospective cohort study at a single tertiary institution.

Featured in the 2026-09-10 issue.

← Back in the game: analyzing performance outcomes following sp…Cell Saver Use is Not Associated With Increased Morbidity But… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.