When is Vertebral Body Tethering in a Patient With an Open Triradiate Cartilage a Good Idea?

J Pediatr Orthop · Sep 03 2026 · Recent

Zale C, Boyce J, Oh T, Davuluri S, Nice E, Pahys JM, et al.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurosurgery, Shriners Children's Philadelphia

Pediatric Orthopaedics Spine

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONIn 115 patients with open triradiate cartilage undergoing thoracic vertebral body tethering, only 56% achieved successful curve correction, with undercorrection linked to larger initial/first-erect curves and overcorrection linked to smaller preoperative curves, helping refine patient selection.
Abstract, as published

BACKGROUND: Vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a fusionless surgical technique used to treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). It is unclear what the optimal window is for surgical intervention using VBT. The purpose of this study is to report the rate of success following VBT in patients with open triradiate cartilage (OTC) and to report the rate of reoperation.

METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS) or AIS with OTC who underwent VBT from 2012 to 2020 with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Success was defined as curves <35 degrees at the last follow-up. Failure was subdivided into undercorrection (curves ≥35 degrees at follow-up or reoperation for tether replacement or conversion to fusion) or overcorrection (curves ≥35 degrees in the contralateral direction or reoperation for tether release, or conversion to fusion). The major coronal curve was measured at preoperative, first erect, and annual visits thereafter. Binary logistic regression models were created to correlate demographic and radiographic variables with failed curve correction.

RESULTS: A total of 115 patients with OTC (60 EOS, 55 AIS) underwent thoracic VBT. Of these, 87% were female, and 91% of the female patients were premenarchal. The median preoperative Sanders score for all groups was 3. Surgery was successful in 64 patients (56%). Fifty-one patients were classified as treatment failures, 34 (29%) were the result of undercorrection, and 17 (15%) were the result of overcorrection. There was a significant difference in the initial thoracic major curve between success and undercorrection groups (53±10 degrees vs. 60± 8 degrees, P<0.05). There was also a significant difference in the first erect thoracic major curve between success and undercorrection (28±11 degrees and 36±9 degrees, P<0.01). There was a significant difference in the first erect percent correction between success and overcorrection (48±17% and 40±13%, P<0.04).

CONCLUSION: VBT with OTC was successful in 56% of the cases. Undercorrection was associated with a thoracic bend of >51 degrees, percent thoracic correction <54%, and upright preoperative thoracic major curve >79 degrees. Overcorrection was associated with an upright preoperative thoracic major curve <46 degrees.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Featured in the 2026-09-05 issue.

← Imaging of ewing sarcoma: an updated analysis including prese…Assessment of the plane of maximum curvature in adolescent id… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.