Reducing the Surveillance Burden in Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasties: A Risk-Adapted Three-Tier Model Based on a Large Patient Cohort.

J Arthroplasty · Sep 07 2026 · Recent

Selim A, Saeed A, George A, Clarke M, Bonde S, Naseem S, et al.

Speciality Trainee of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Oswestry, UK

Adult Reconstruction

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONA risk-adapted three-tier surveillance model for metal-on-metal hips performed comparably to MHRA protocol in detecting abnormal MRI or revision while cutting follow-up workload by about 75% and saving costs.
Abstract, as published

BACKGROUND: Since 2017, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in the United Kingdom (UK) has mandated comprehensive surveillance for patients with metal-on-metal (MoM) hips. We aimed to develop a risk-adapted follow-up pathway, with the goal of safely reducing unnecessary visits and investigations.

METHODS: We analyzed 845 MoM hip resurfacings and large-head MoM Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). The primary outcome was abnormal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or revision. Logistic regressions identified the predictors, which were translated into a clinical risk score for Tier-1 and Tier-2.

RESULTS: In Tier-1, the strongest predictors (by adjusted odds ratio, aOR) were women (2.0), bilateral (1.7), glomerular filtration rate less than 60 (1.6), age less than 50 years (1.4), head size less than 48 mm (1.2), and high-risk implant (1.2). In Tier-2, the predictors were abnormal X-ray (10.6), pain (3.7), abnormal metal-ion level (2.5), and other symptoms (1.6). The hierarchical model, using thresholds of Tier-1 ≥ 3 and Tier-2 ≥ 2, achieved a sensitivity (0.84), a specificity (0.51), and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.67. By comparison, the MHRA approach demonstrated a sensitivity (0.88), specificity (0.34), and an AUROC of 0.61. The hierarchical model reduced annual follow-up from 69 to 53%. High-risk reviews were extended to three-yearly, and low-risk surveillance was discontinued. This resulted in savings of £46,000 to £59,000 [$61,400 to $78,800] per 1,000 patients annually, a 75% reduction in workload compared with the MHRA approach.

CONCLUSIONS: We propose a risk-adapted, three-tier pathway: (1) baseline stratification into high- and low-risk groups using the clinical risk score; (2) surveillance of high-risk patients every three years, including symptom review, radiographs, and optional metal-ion testing; and (3) MRI reserved for patients who have Tier-2 abnormalities above the risk score. Low-risk patients have limited benefits from follow-up beyond 10 years unless symptomatic.

Featured in the 2026-10-07 issue.

← Relative-Value Units in Arthroplasty: Past, Present, and Future.Postoperative outcomes after total knee arthroplasty in type … →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.