Concordance and Discordance of Intraoperative Nerve Root Findings in Brachial Plexus Birth Injury.

J Pediatr Orthop · Aug 10 2026 · Recent

Chen CJ, Zlotolow DA, Crowe CS, Park E, Kozin SH

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shriners Hospitals for Children Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA

Pediatric Orthopaedics Hand & Upper Extremity

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONIn 162 BPBI patients, preoperative root-level classification agreed with intraoperative findings 83% of the time, but C7-C8 injuries were frequently underestimated, arguing for careful C8 assessment and reinterpreting Horner syndrome as a severity marker rather than a sign of global injury.
Abstract, as published

BACKGROUND: Accurate preoperative characterization of brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI) is important for counseling and surgical planning, but the prediction of root-level injury remains challenging. We evaluated the agreement between preoperative injury classification and intraoperative nerve root findings, patterns of discordance, and the influence of Horner syndrome (HS).

METHODS: A retrospective review identified 162 infants who underwent primary brachial plexus exploration and reconstruction at a single institution between 2004 and 2023. Preoperative injury classification was assigned from clinical examination and Active Movement Scale (AMS) scores using a root level classification (2025): Injury A (C5-6), B (C5-7), C (C5-8), and D (C5-T1). Intraoperative class was assigned from operative findings, including nerve stimulation and direct assessment of root integrity.

RESULTS: Preoperative and intraoperative classifications were concordant in 135 of 162 patients (83.3%) and discordant in 27 (16.7%), with substantial overall agreement (Cohen kappa=0.700). Concordance was highest for Injury D (C5-T1) and poorest for Injury C (C5-C8). Preoperative classification was least accurate for Injury C, with only 1 of 14 cases correctly identified. Among the 27 discordant cases, undercalls were more common than overcalls (19 [70.4%] vs. 8 [29.6%]), most frequently involving B-to-C and A-to-B misclassification. C7 and C8 were the roots most often misidentified. Concordance did not differ significantly before versus after adoption of differential nerve stimulation (86.9% vs. 81.2%, P=0.070). All undercalls occurred without HS. All 5 overcall events in which preoperative Injury D was downgraded intraoperatively to Injury B or C occurred in patients with HS, injuries of which had higher preoperative AMS scores than concordant D-D injuries.

CONCLUSION: This intraoperative BPBI classification provides reliable broad categorization preoperatively with substantial agreement but is vulnerable at the C7-C8 transition. Focused assessment of the C8 nerve root is important because this injury pattern is commonly misidentified and may affect diagnosis and treatment. Viewing HS as a marker of severity rather than a standalone sign of global injury may improve preoperative assessment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-retrospective case series.

Featured in the 2026-09-18 issue.

← Development and Preliminary Validation of a Tactile, 3D-Print…Reoperations After Soft Tissue Release for Spastic Hip Displa… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.