Revision Indication Is Associated with Early Mortality After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Population-Based Study.

J Arthroplasty · Sep 21 2026 · Recent

Restrepo DJ, Gonzalez-Bravo AE, Guarin Perez SF, Perry KI, Taunton MJ, Abdel MP, et al.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street S.W. Rochester, MN 55905

Adult Reconstruction Orthopaedic Trauma

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONIn 8,667 revision hips, 90-day mortality was 0.9%, unrelated to revision extent but about 3-4 times higher for periprosthetic fracture or infection than aseptic loosening.
Abstract, as published

BACKGROUND: Revision total hip arthroplasty (R-THA) is associated with increased complexity and potential for early postoperative complications, including mortality. This study evaluated 30- and 90-day mortality after R-THA.

METHODS: We identified 6,946 patients undergoing 8,667 R-THA at a single institution between 1997 and 2023. Their mean age was 66 years and had a mean body mass index (BMI) of 30, and 53% were women. Indications for R-THA included aseptic loosening (37%), periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (15%), dislocation (14%), and periprosthetic fracture (PPFX) (11%). Revisions included single-component (49%), both-component (30%), and modular-component exchanges (21%). Mortality at 30 and 90 days was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Adjusted Cox models identified risk factors. The observed number of deaths was compared with the expected number of deaths using standardized mortality ratios (SMR).

RESULTS: The 30- and 90-day mortalities were 0.5% (n = 38) and 0.9% (n = 75), respectively. Unadjusted mortality rates at 90 days were 2.6% for PPfx, 1.4% for PJI, 0.9% for dislocation, and 0.4% for aseptic loosening. Compared with aseptic loosening, revision for PPFx and PJI had increased adjusted 30-day mortality (hazard ratio (HR) = 5.37 and 3.16) and 90-day mortality (HR = 3.96 and 2.95; all P < 0.01). Extent of revision was not associated with mortality (P > 0.05). Overall, compared with individuals in the general population, 30-day mortality among patients undergoing R-THA was higher (SMR = 1.77; P = 0.002), and this is primarily driven by a higher 30- and 90-day mortality seen in those undergoing revision for PPFx (30-day SMR = 3.67; 90-day SMR = 2.61) or PJI (30-day SMR = 3.18; 90-day SMR = 2.0 (all P < 0.001)).

CONCLUSION: Revision THA carries a low 30- and 90-day mortality risk that is not associated with the extent of revision, but is strongly impacted by the indication for revision. Patients revised for PPfx and PJI face a 3- and 4-fold higher risk of mortality within 90 days compared to aseptic loosening and demonstrate increased early mortality when compared with age- and sex-matched United States population expectations.

Featured in the 2026-10-03 issue.

← Factors Associated with Increased Lengths of Stay After Total…

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.