Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Evidence Maturity and the Path Forward in the United States.

J Bone Joint Surg Am · Oct 09 2026 · Recent

Kim MT, Lee S, Goh GS, Park DY, Cho SK, Kim JS, et al.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts

Spine

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONEndoscopic spine surgery matches microscopic and tubular outcomes for lumbar disc herniation and stenosis, but cervical and thoracic evidence is thin, and US adoption is limited by learning curve, training, and reimbursement.
Abstract, as published

➢ As has been shown by higher-level evidence, endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) provides clinical outcomes comparable with those of microscopic and tubular techniques for lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis.➢ The cervical and thoracic ESS evidence base has been limited, with a lack of contemporary multicenter randomized trials and overreliance on single-center retrospective data.➢ U.S. adoption has been constrained by a steep learning curve, limited training pathways, and reimbursement challenges, despite increasing interest and fellowship exposure.➢ The economic viability of ESS is facility-dependent, with higher disposable costs possibly offset by reduced hospital resource utilization. Migration of spine surgery into ambulatory surgery centers may also create additional opportunities for ESS adoption.➢ Broader U.S. integration will require standardized training, multi-institutional outcome registries, and alignment with value-based payment models, such as the 2026 Medicare Transforming Episode Accountability Model (TEAM) program.

Featured in the 2026-10-15 issue.

← Sagittal Alignment in Cervical Spine Fusion: Principles, Para…Development of a Multivariable Prognostic Model for Risk Stra… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.