Patient-specific management in high-risk revision total hip arthroplasty: mid-term outcomes of a next-generation constrained acetabular liner.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg · Oct 20 2026 · Recent

Khury F, Luebbering B, Ruff G, Bahlouli L, Sarfraz A, Schwarzkopf R, et al.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York

Adult Reconstruction

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONIn 37 high-risk revision THAs using a next-generation constrained liner (mean 4.7-year follow-up), there was no wear, breakage, or cup loosening, and reoperation-free survivorship was 72.6% at latest follow-up.
Abstract, as published

BACKGROUND: Managing recurrent instability in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) requires a personalized approach, as traditional constrained liners often yield suboptimal results due to locking-mechanism failure and limited impingement-free range of motion. This study aimed to evaluate the mid-term clinical outcomes of a novel constrained acetabular liner (CAL) when utilized as a patient-specific solution for a high-risk cohort undergoing complex rTHA. By tailoring the constraint to individual biomechanical deficits, this next-generation device seeks to mitigate historic failure modes.

METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 32 patients who underwent 37 rTHA procedures with a next-generation CAL at a single urban academic center between March 2017 and October 2023. Average follow-up was 4.7 years (range, 0.3 to 9.7 years). The most common indication for rTHA was instability (70.3%), followed by infection (16.2%), aseptic loosening (10.8%), and polyethylene wear (2.7%). Just over one third of patients (37.5%) had undergone a prior revision. Preoperative constructs included fixed-bearing (37.8%), dual-mobility (32.4%), CAL (24.3%), static spacer (2.7%), and hemiarthroplasty (2.7%).

RESULTS: In most procedures (70.3%), the CAL was implanted into a pre-existing acetabular cup, whereas 29.7% involved both cup and liner revision. Following rTHA, no cases of implant wear, breakage, acetabular cup aseptic loosening, or periprosthetic fracture were observed. Six patients (18.8%) underwent a total of sixteen subsequent reoperations after CAL implantation-10 for instability and 6 for infection. Among instability-related reoperations, 4 involved revision to a new next-generation CAL. Survivorship free from all-cause reoperation was 83.8% at one year and 72.6% at latest follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates favorable mid-term clinical outcomes and reoperation-free survivorship following complex revision THA using a novel constrained acetabular liner system. For patient cohorts suffering from severe recurrent dislocation, this next-generation CAL provides an effective, tailored tool in the surgical armamentarium by adapting to unique patient anatomy and soft-tissue compromises. Further research with larger sample sizes and extended follow-up is needed to assess long-term durability.

Featured in the 2026-10-25 issue.

← Preoperative disability is independently associated with post…Projected Deficiencies in the United States Arthroplasty Work… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.