Association Between the Bone-cutting Width-to-facet Distance Ratio and Neurological Recovery After Cervical Laminoplasty.

Spine J · Oct 21 2026 · Recent

Kwon K, Cho ST, Park S, Doh CH, Cho JH, Hwang CJ, et al.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Republic of Korea

Spine

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONIn 108 cervical laminoplasty patients, wider bone-cutting enlarged the canal but did not improve JOA recovery, and dural contact did not worsen outcomes, suggesting maximizing cut width adds little neurological benefit.
Abstract, as published

BACKGROUND: In open-door cervical laminoplasty, gutter position sets the bone-cutting width and canal expansion. Whether a wider opening adds benefit, or a conservative opening with residual dural contact suffices, remains unclear.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the laminoplasty width-to-facet distance ratio (LP/Facet percentage) is associated with neurological recovery.

PATIENT SAMPLE: 108 patients who underwent open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy (2017-2024); 75 with preoperative JOA <15 formed the recovery cohort.

OUTCOME MEASURES: JOA recovery rate at postoperative one year.

METHODS: LP/Facet percentage, open-door angle, and canal area were measured. Associations were examined with Spearman correlation, group comparisons with Benjamini-Hochberg FDR adjustment, and multivariable linear regression of the 1-year postoperative JOA score. The authors report no study-specific funding or conflicts of interest.

RESULTS: The LP/Facet percentage was not associated with JOA recovery (ρ = -0.017, P = 0.888) and this remained unchanged after adjustment for the preoperative JOA score, age, OPLL, operated levels, and cervical alignment (B = -0.031, P = 0.260). Greater width correlated with canal enlargement (ρ = +0.305, P = 0.008), but the canal area did not predict recovery (ρ = -0.056, P = 0.632). Patients with dural contact (32/103) showed similar recovery to those without contact (P = 0.387). Patients with neurological worsening had a higher LP/Facet percentage in unadjusted comparison (P = 0.013), although this did not persist after FDR correction (adjusted P = 0.079).

CONCLUSION: Within the range of decompression achieved in this cohort, relative bone-cutting width was not associated with neurological recovery. Wider cutting enlarged the canal but did not improve JOA recovery, and dural contact was not associated with worse recovery. Although these findings do not establish equivalence between narrower and wider decompression, they suggest that routinely maximizing bone-cutting width may offer limited additional neurological benefit.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.

Featured in the 2026-10-28 issue.

← Comparison of Lateral Decubitus versus Prone Lateral Lumbar I…Value Defects in Spine Surgery: How to Reduce Wasteful Care a… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.