Contact injury mechanism is independently associated with greater Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Severity Scale severity in patients undergoing primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc · Oct 26 2026 · Recent

Malhamé ZM, Hardy A, Bouché PA, Santoli A, Miele A, Seil R, et al.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Paris Saclay University, France

Sports Medicine

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONIn 482 sport-related ACL reconstructions, contact injury mechanism independently predicted greater structural injury severity on the ACLISS (OR 2.68), while sport category did not, so document the mechanism.
Abstract, as published

PURPOSE: To determine whether injury mechanism and sport category were independently associated with overall structural injury severity after sport-related primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture, as quantified by the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Severity Scale (ACLISS).

METHODS: This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data included consecutive patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction between November 2022 and November 2024. Eligible patients had sustained a complete primary ACL rupture during sport, undergone magnetic resonance imaging within 8 weeks of injury and had complete imaging and arthroscopic documentation. Injury mechanism was classified as contact or non-contact, and sports as pivoting-contact, pivoting-non-contact or non-pivoting. Associations with severity grade were assessed using proportional-odds ordinal logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, body mass index and injury-to-surgery interval. Models evaluated injury mechanism, sport category and both exposures simultaneously. The continuous score was examined in sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS: Among 482 patients, 175 (36.3%) sustained contact injuries and 307 (63.7%) sustained non-contact injuries. Contact injuries had higher ACLISS mean scores than non-contact injuries (4.6 vs. 3.8; p < 0.001) and were more frequently classified in higher severity grades. In the fully adjusted model, contact injury remained independently associated with greater severity (odds ratio, 2.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.68-4.27; p < 0.001), whereas sport category was no longer associated with severity. Adding injury mechanism improved model fit, whereas adding sport category to a model already containing injury mechanism did not. Continuous-score analysis confirmed the principal finding (adjusted mean difference, 0.60 points; 95% CI, 0.29-0.91; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction after a sport-related ACL rupture, contact injury mechanism was independently associated with greater structural injury severity. This association persisted after adjustment for sport category, whereas the association with sport category was attenuated. Injury mechanism should therefore be documented when characterizing injury severity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Featured in the 2026-10-31 issue.

← Preserving the Native ACL: A Scoping Review of Bridge-Enhance…Efficacy of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Sampling in Muscle… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.