Effect of a new functional insole compared to a common bedding insole therapy for plantar fasciitis: A prospective randomized multicenter study.

Foot Ankle Surg · Oct 23 2026 · Recent

Hardt S, Brozat-Essen S, Vogt D, Krieger H, Kauffhold A, Wendlandt R, et al.

Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus, Germany

Foot & Ankle

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONIn a randomized trial of 131 plantar fasciitis patients, functional insoles were no better than soft cushioning insoles, and about 85% improved in pain and mobility with either type.
Abstract, as published

BACKGROUND: Plantar fasciitis (PF) is a leading cause of heel pain. Treatment options range from conservative to invasive. Insoles offer a low-cost option that barely has side effects, however the therapeutic efficacy of insole therapy remains unclear. This study compares outcomes in patients using functional versus soft cushioning insoles.

METHODS: In this randomized, multicenter study, 131 participants with PF were assigned to soft cushioning (group A) or functional insoles (group B). Questionnaires were completed at 0, 6, 12, and 24 weeks using the Foot and Ankle Disability Index, the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society score, and a Visual Analogue Scale for pain. Statistical analysis used a 5% significance level.

RESULTS: Sex, obesity, and time spent standing/walking did not correlate with symptom severity. 84.5% showed significant improvement in pain and mobility with either insole type.

CONCLUSION: No superiority of functional over soft cushioning insoles was demonstrated; both effectively treat PF.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Ib.

Featured in the 2026-10-30 issue.

← Foot Drop in Orthopaedic Surgery: Anatomy, Etiology, Differen…Implant Choice Impacts Initial Tibial Component Micromotion i… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.