Health-related quality of life following periprosthetic femoral fracture after total hip arthroplasty : a propensity score-matched cohort study with trajectory analysis.

Bone Joint J · Nov 01 2026 · Recent

Ablett AD, Powell-Bowns MFR, Super JT, Neo C, Yapp LZ, Clement ND, et al.

Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Adult Reconstruction Orthopaedic Trauma

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONAfter periprosthetic femoral fracture following primary THA, about two-thirds of 140 patients had clinically meaningful declines in quality of life versus matched controls, and one in ten reported states worse than death, which matters for counseling.
Abstract, as published

AIMS: The aim of this study was to quantify the impact of a postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture following a primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) compared with normal values in the general population, and to assess the agreement between recalled pre-fracture and prospectively collected PROMs.

METHODS: This single-centre retrospective cohort study involved 140 operatively managed patients with a periprosthetic femoral fracture which was sustained around a primary THA, between 2007 and 2025, with a minimum follow-up of one year. The EQ-5D-3L, EQ-VAS, and Oxford Hip Score (OHS) were collected at a median of 2.9 years (IQR 1.9 to 5.5) after the fracture. Complete case propensity score matching (1:5) balanced patients who had a periprosthetic fracture with Health Survey for England general population controls (n = 700) by sex, age, and deprivation. An agreement cohort with data from a linked arthroplasty database enabled comparison between prospectively collected PROMs one year after THA and recalled pre-fracture PROMs, as well as the analysis of PROMs at four timepoints (before THA, one year after THA, pre-fracture recall, and after the periprosthetic femoral fracture).

RESULTS: The mean EQ-5D-3L scores after periprosthetic femoral fracture were significantly lower than those in the matched general population (mean difference -0.209 (95% CI -0.264 to -0.154); p < 0.001). Almost two-thirds of patients (62.9%; n = 88) reported a clinically meaningful decrease compared with the general population, with 9.3% (n = 13/140) reporting health states which were worse than death. Subgroup analysis of patients with prospectively collected one-year post-THA and recalled pre-injury PROMs (n = 22) showed good agreement (EQ-5D-3L, intraclass correlation coefficient 0.884 (95% CI 0.746 to 0.950)), with 77.3% (n = 17) being within the minimal important change threshold. Analysis of the trajectory at the four timepoints showed that a periprosthetic femoral fracture had a lasting impact on PROMs, with 38.9% of EQ-5D-3L and 36.4% of the benefit in the OHS being erased following the fracture.

CONCLUSION: A periprosthetic femoral fracture following primary THA was associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in PROMs in about two-thirds of patients, with one-in-ten reporting health states worse than death, at a median follow-up of about three years. These findings have important implications when counselling patients and for targeted strategies designed to prevent a periprosthetic femoral fracture.

Featured in the 2026-11-02 issue.

← Risk Factors for Re-Revision After Aseptic Revision Total Kne…Can the use of an inclinometer improve acetabular cup inclina… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.