Platelet-Rich Plasma versus Corticosteroid Injections for Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg · Nov 05 2026 · Recent

Liu L, Roemer J, Gerges PE, Lugo E, John DQ, Lima DJL, et al.

Atlantis Orthopedics - Palm Beach Shoulder Service, Palm Beach Research and Education Foundation, Department of…

Shoulder & Elbow

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONMeta-analysis of 8 studies (518 patients) found no significant short- or mid-term pain difference between PRP and corticosteroid injections for subacromial impingement, though heterogeneity was high; choose by cost, availability, and patient preference.
Abstract, as published

BACKGROUND: Subacromial impingement syndrome (SAI) is a common cause of shoulder pain. Corticosteroid injection (CS) provides short-term relief, but concerns about tendon health and durability have increased interest in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as an alternative. This meta-analysis compared pain and functional outcomes after PRP versus CS for SAI.

METHODS: A systematic review was performed per PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing PRP and CS for SAI. VAS pain scores and shoulder-specific functional outcomes were extracted, and random-effects meta-analyses were performed at baseline, short-term, and mid-term follow-up.

RESULTS: Eight studies (518 patients; 7 RCTs and 1 non-randomized comparative study) were included, with 259 patients per group. Baseline VAS scores were comparable (MD 0.03, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.15; I2 = 0%). Short- and mid-term VAS scores showed no significant difference between groups (short-term MD 0.47, 95% CI -0.35 to 1.29; mid-term MD 0.50, 95% CI -1.80 to 2.80), though heterogeneity was substantial (I2 = 93.6% and 98.0%), falling to 49.2% and 80.2% after excluding the non-randomized study. Functional outcomes were inconsistently reported; at 6 months, Constant score differences ranged from -13.0 to +17.2, and UCLA differences ranged from -0.6 to +0.3.

CONCLUSION: PRP and CS showed no significant difference in short- or mid-term pain relief for SAI, but heterogeneity between trials was substantial. Functional outcomes were inconsistently reported across studies. Current evidence does not show it is clinically superior to CS for pain relief, and treatment choice should still weigh cost, availability, and patient preference.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, Systematic Review.

Featured in the 2026-11-07 issue.

← Lateralized versus nonlateralized reverse total shoulder arth…Proceedings from the 2025 International Consensus Meeting on … →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.