Sensory nerve transfers in the upper limb after peripheral nerve injury: a scoping review.

J Hand Surg Eur Vol · Sep 2024 · Review

Duraku LS, Hundepool CA, Moore AM, Eberlin KR, Michiel Zuidam J, George S, et al.

The Hand & Peripheral Nerve Injury Department, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK

Hand & Upper Extremity

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONA scoping review of 22 studies found distal sensory nerve transfers in the upper limb more successful than proximal ones for restoring protective sensation, though evidence is sparse and donor morbidity is poorly reported.
Abstract, as published

Nerve transfer for motor nerve paralysis is an established technique for treating complex nerve injuries. However, nerve transfer for sensory reconstruction has not been widely used, and published research on this topic is limited compared to motor nerve transfer. The indications and outcomes of nerve transfer for the restoration of sensory function remain unproven. This scoping review examines the indications, outcomes and complications of sensory nerve transfer. In total, 22 studies were included; the major finding is that distal sensory nerve transfers are more successful than proximal ones in succeeding protective sensation. Although the risk of extension of the sensory deficit with donor site loss and morbidity from neuromas remain a barrier to wider adoption, these complications were not reported in the review. Further, the scarcity of studies and small patient series limit the ability to determine sensory nerve transfer success. However, sensory restoration remains an opportunity for surgeons to pursue.Level of evidence: II.

Featured in the 2026-11-01 issue.

← Carpal dislocations.Current Trends in 4-Corner and 3-Corner Fusions: Comparing Op… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.