Current Trends in 4-Corner and 3-Corner Fusions: Comparing Open and Arthroscopic Approaches.

Hand Clin · May 2026 · Review

Paul R, Persitz J

Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Canada

Hand & Upper Extremity

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONReview comparing open and arthroscopic 3- and 4-corner fusion for SLAC and SNAC wrist arthritis, noting arthroscopic promise for motion and recovery but limited long-term comparative data, so technique should be individualized.
Abstract, as published

The 4-corner and 3-corner fusions are established treatments for scapholunate and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse arthritis, effectively alleviating pain while maintaining partial mobility. Traditionally performed via open techniques, advancements in arthroscopy now allow for minimally invasive approaches that may prove to reduce complications and accelerate recovery. Various fixation methods, including compression screws, dorsal plates, staples, and Kirschner wires influence stability and outcomes. Although arthroscopic approaches show promise in preserving motion and grip strength, long-term comparative data remain limited. The choice of technique should be tailored to patient needs, surgeon expertise, and anatomic considerations, balancing pain relief with functional restoration.

Featured in the 2026-11-01 issue.

← Sensory nerve transfers in the upper limb after peripheral ne…Introduction & Successful Bionic Reconstruction Necessitates … →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.