Global trends and outcomes of nerve transfers for treatment of adult brachial plexus injuries.

J Hand Surg Eur Vol · Oct 2024 · Review

Crowe CS, Spinner RJ, Shin AY

Division of Hand Surgery, Department of Orthopaedics, Mayo Clinic

Hand & Upper Extremity

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONA global literature review found substantial regional variability in indications and outcomes for spinal accessory, intercostal, and fascicular nerve transfers used to treat adult brachial plexus injuries.
Abstract, as published

The presentation, management and outcomes of brachial plexus injuries are likely to be subject to regional differences across the globe. A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify relevant articles related to spinal accessory to suprascapular, intercostal to musculocutaneous, and ulnar and/or median nerve fascicle to biceps and/or brachialis motor branch nerve transfers for treatment of brachial plexus injuries. A total of 6007 individual brachial plexus injuries were described with a mean follow-up of 38 months. The specific indication for accessory to suprascapular and intercostal to musculocutaneous transfers were considerably different among regions (e.g. upper plexus vs. pan-plexal), while uniform for fascicular transfer for elbow flexion (e.g. upper plexus +/- C7). Similarly, functional recovery was highly variable for accessory to suprascapular and intercostal to musculocutaneous transfers, while British Medical Research Council grade ≥3 strength after fascicular transfer for elbow flexion was frequently obtained. Overall, differences in outcomes seem to be inherent to the specific transfer being utilized.Level of evidence: III.

Featured in the 2026-09-29 issue.

← Staple Technology for Fracture Fixation and Joint Arthrodesis.Revision wrist arthroplasty strategies. →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.