Carpal tunnel release during distal radius fracture fixation is not associated with reduced subsequent carpal tunnel release: A propensity-matched cohort study.

Injury · Jul 08 2026 · Recent

Dinesh A, Poursalehian M, Marjoua Y, Billow D, Padubidri A, Cereijo C, et al.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue

Hand & Upper Extremity Orthopaedic Trauma

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONA large propensity-matched study found concomitant carpal tunnel release during distal radius fixation did not reduce subsequent CTR rates and was associated with higher revision/malunion surgery rates.
Abstract, as published

PURPOSE: Concomitant carpal tunnel release (CTR) during distal radius fracture (DRF) fixation is performed with the goal of preventing symptomatic carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). However, evidence supporting this practice remains limited. This study evaluated whether CTR at the time of DRF open reduction and internal fixation reduces subsequent CTR procedures and other associated surgical complications.

METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX database identified adult patients who underwent DRF open reduction and internal fixation between 2010 and 2025. Patients were categorized based on whether they received CTR at the time of DRF fixation. Propensity score matching controlled for demographic and clinical variables, including fracture complexity. The primary outcome was subsequent CTR procedure within 2 years. Secondary outcomes included 90-day complications (emergency department visits, readmission, hematoma) and 1-year surgical complications (infection, malunion/nonunion surgery, revision surgery).

RESULTS: Among 53,565 patients identified, 5090 matched pairs were analyzed. Patients who received CTR at the time of DRF fixation did not have significantly different rates of subsequent CTR at 1 year (1.75% vs 1.61%; HR 1.112, 95% CI 0.824-1.501) or 2 years (2.24% vs 1.79%; HR 1.306, 95% CI 0.992-1.721). CTR at the time of DRF fixation was associated with higher rates of revision DRF surgery at both 1 year (2.97% vs 2.10%) and 2 years (3.32% vs 2.36%), malunion/nonunion surgery at both 1 year (0.92% vs 0.53%) and 2 years (0.98% vs 0.63%), and 90-day emergency department visits (7.62% vs 6.03%). Infection rates were not significantly different at 1 year or 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS: CTR at the time of DRF fixation was not associated with reduced subsequent CTR procedures. These findings do not support routine CTR during DRF fixation.

Featured in the 2026-07-25 issue.

← The Role of Exosomes in Upper-Extremity Tissue Regeneration.Treatment of Kienböck's disease with capitate shortening and … →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.