Effect of Combined Tendon Remnant Preservation and Bone Marrow Stimulation on Rotator Cuff Healing: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

J Shoulder Elbow Surg · Jul 16 2026 · Recent

Scaini A, Maggini E, Daffara V, Guizzi A, Bergomi A, Milano G

Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, Italy

Shoulder & Elbow Sports Medicine

SUMMARY — THE REDUCTIONCombining tendon remnant preservation with small-diameter bone marrow stimulation during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair significantly improved tendon healing rates (80.8% vs 53.8%) versus standard repair, though clinical outcome scores were similar.
Abstract, as published

INTRODUCTION: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair provides satisfactory functional results. However, imaging studies show a high healing failure rate. Recent studies on animal models evaluated the effect of preserving the tendon remnant of the rotator cuff on tendon healing, showing a positive impact by combining tendon remnant preservation and small bone vents on the greater tuberosity. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a combined biologic augmentation technique consisting of tendon remnant preservation on the rotator cuff footprint and bone marrow stimulation of the greater tuberosity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair associated with small-diameter bone marrow stimulation holes, 1 mm in diameter (nanofractures) and tendon footprint preservation were included. Standard arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs were used as controls. The primary outcome was subjective functional assessment with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score. Secondary patient-reported outcomes were the short version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick-DASH) scale and the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Index, and structural integrity of repaired tendons by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed six months after surgery. Significance tests were run to assess differences between groups for baseline characteristics and at follow-up. Statistical Significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS: The study included 52 patients (26 in each group). The mean age of patients was 64.8±6.9 years. Mean follow-up was 42.3±6.6 months. No significant differences between groups for baseline characteristics were found. Comparison between pre- and postoperative functional scores showed significant improvement at follow-up in both groups (p<0.001). No significant differences between groups were observed for primary and secondary clinical outcomes. Structural integrity was assessed in all the patients included. Significant difference between groups was observed in favor of the index group. Tendon healed in 14 (53.8%) and in 21 (80.8%) in the control and index group, respectively (p=0.039).

CONCLUSIONS: Preservation of rotator cuff tendon remnant combined with small bone vents of the greater tuberosity during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair provided significant improvements in tendon healing rate compared to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with soft tissue debridement and cortical abrasion of the greater tuberosity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Treatment Study.

Featured in the 2026-08-07 issue.

← The ABCs of shoulder measurements.Outcomes of Implant Removal After Failed Radial Head Arthropl… →

The Reduction is a free email digest of newly published orthopaedic literature — a handful of new papers in the subspecialties you choose, each summarized like this one. Subscribe free or browse the archive.